Different distribution of traditional Chinese medicine body constitution across population, mechanism and implications
Editorial

Different distribution of traditional Chinese medicine body constitution across population, mechanism and implications

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used in the treatment and prevention of disease for over thousands of years. Assessing body constitution (BC) is considered one of the principles for guiding the practice of TCM. Furthermore, it represents one of the earliest attempts at applying the principle of personalized medicine. The major limitations to broadly implement the BC framework, and probably TCM as a whole, involve not only a lack of empirical study on its association to other models of medicine, but also a poor investigation of its applicability in populations other than Chinese population (1). Wang et al. developed and validated the instruments to measure BCs using Chinese Medicine Questionnaire, including Gentleness type, Yin-deficiency type, Yang-deficiency type, Qi-deficiency type, Dampness-heat type, Phlegm-dampness type, Blood-stasis type, Qi-depression type, and Special diathesis type over 10 years ago (2). Since then, a number of studies have been undergone to use the BC assessment. However, almost all the studies applying the BC instrument have been performed in Chinese populations. Recently, we, for the first time, conducted a study using TCM BC in an American population (1). We found that the major types of TCM BC types for white Americans differed from those for Chinese populations (1). However, the sample size of our study is not large enough. Furthermore, multiple factors, including selection bias (i.e., conducted in participants with colorectal polyps), may contribute to these differences. Thus, it is critical to confirm the findings. If confirmed, these findings may not only improve our understanding of the mechanism for TCM, but also discover novel factors for disease risk, laying a foundation for the personalized prevention of common chronic disease.

Following these novel and exciting findings, in this series, we invited original articles, review and systematic review to (I) further confirm the findings; (II) explore the underlying mechanism and implications for these important research findings; and (III) understand the distributions of major types of TCM BC in different countries. Several original manuscripts published in this issue has investigated whether the differences are caused by selection bias (i.e., studies conducted in those with colorectal polyps), different prevalence rates of obesity, and environments (i.e., immigration studies). We wish these novel findings will lead to new inquiries to further confirm the findings, understand the mechanism and identify novel factors contributing to the differences. These efforts potentially lay a foundation for the development of novel prevention and treatment strategies of common chronic diseases not only in US and Chinese populations, but also in populations from other countries.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Longhua Chinese Medicine for the series “Different Distribution of Traditional Chinese Medicine Body Constitution Across Population, Mechanism and Implications”. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: The author has completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://lcm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/lcm-23-4/coif). The series “Different Distribution of Traditional Chinese Medicine Body Constitution Across Population, Mechanism and Implications” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. QD served as the unpaid Guest Editor of the series. The author has no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The author is accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. ShuLYinXZhuXAssociations between Traditional Chinese Medicine Body Constitution and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in a White population.medRxiv 2022;2022.12.13.22283433. 10.1101/2022.12.13.22283433
  2. Wang Q. Individualized medicine, health medicine, and constitutional theory in Chinese medicine. Front Med 2012;6:1-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Qi Dai1,2

1Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA;2Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. (Email: Qi.Dai@vanderbilt.edu)

Keywords: Body constitution; US population; confirm the findings

Received: 30 January 2023; Accepted: 02 March 2023; Published online: 30 June 2023.

doi: 10.21037/lcm-23-4

doi: 10.21037/lcm-23-4
Cite this article as: Dai Q. Different distribution of traditional Chinese medicine body constitution across population, mechanism and implications. Longhua Chin Med 2023;6:3.

Download Citation